Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied

By
image

© weyo | stock.adobe.com

This legal maxim essentially means that if a legal remedy is available to a party to redress an injury or wrong but is not acted upon in a reasonable time frame, it is effectively the same as having no remedy at all. William Penn similarly stated: “To delay justice is injustice,” and Martin Luther King Jr. wrote in his Letter From Birmingham Jail: “Justice too long delayed is justice denied.”

Recently, a rep contacted me to request my assistance in recovering more than $100,000 in commission she stated was owed to her by a principal. This is a substantial sum and I, therefore, suspected initially that it was generated as result of a major, recent sale by the rep for which the principal refused to pay what it perceived was too large of a commission. (This happens far more than I care to recall.) However, I quickly learned that this substantial sum had accumulated over a several-year period and did not only recently become due.

When I questioned the client as to why she had waited so long to seek “justice,” she disclosed myriad explanations, which included, (1) I had other lines to worry about and wasn’t paying close attention to what was owed; (2) the principal told me it was going through cash-flow problems, so I didn’t want to add more hardship; (3) I would ask on occasion and the principal would tell me it would make it up in the next month; (4) other reps were getting terminated by the principal after they asked to be paid overdue commissions; (5) I didn’t want to bother and upset the principal; (6) the principal’s owner was a “nice guy;” (7) the principal stopped sending me commission statements; (8) business seemed to be slowing; (9) I hadn’t brought a large sale into the principal in a while; and (10) I was doing okay representing other lines.

Compounding this delay of justice was the principal actually expressing and displaying to its reps signs of real financial stress to the point of worrying its reps as to whether the principal would continue as a going concern. And it was at this moment that the rep decided to seek legal counsel to determine whether anything could be done to recover her long-overdue earned commissions.

Late Is Barely Better Than Never

Prior to seeking legal advice and requesting that we make a formal pre-suit demand, the rep had made her own written “demand” for overdue and unpaid commissions. In response, the principal officially severed its relationship with the rep and offered to pay her about 20 percent of all that was outstanding over the course of 24 months without interest or personal guaranty. Now what?

Well, we put together an even scarier demand letter with threats of litigation and all manner of pestilence should the principal not pay all that was due. The principal, again, responded — with the same basic factual response, but additional legal and practical defenses and explanations. It said that it would agree to pay what it thought the rep had previously accepted, which was about 20 percent of what was owed, over the course of 24 months without interest or guaranty. But my letter was really scary! Nonetheless, the principal was on the verge of bankruptcy, it had likely conveyed most of its profits over the years to the owner’s wife or purchased things like a summer house, boats, RVs and other personal assets. Sure, we could sue, force the principal into bankruptcy, try to unwind some of the alleged fraudulent transfers outside of the company, but even before getting that far, we would have to convince someone — a judge or jury, that there were legally justifiable reasons why our client did not previously demand payment of her earned commissions.

There are actual legal defenses to payment when a payee delays pursuing payment. In the law, these defenses have names like waiver, laches, abandonment, accord and satisfaction, and release (see opposite page for some definitions). Of course, it is possible for each one of these defenses to be overcome, but the practical and likely result of such delay is justice — in the form of a full recovery of each and every dollar earned and owed to this rep — DENIED.

Do Not Delay

Please do not wait to demand and require that your principal pay you completely and without delay or excuse. In my more than 30 years of practice, I have never heard of a good excuse to delay requesting payment. Unlike a good wine, commission disputes do not improve with age. All you are requesting each time that a sale is made by you for the benefit of your principal is the payment that both parties agreed to, and that the law requires you to be paid. And let’s not forget to mention: You have earned it! Let any one of your MANA attorneys, who specialize in the areas of law unique to reps, achieve justice for you.

MANA welcomes your comments on this article. Write to us at [email protected].

End of article
  • photo of John Riccione

John M. Riccione has been associated with MANA for over 18 years and has been instrumental in crafting MANA’s useful representative agreements and guidelines. He is partner in Taft Stettinus & Hollister, LLP, Chicago, Illinois, and has been a business litigator for over 30 years. His practice involves the representation of businesses and entrepreneurs in a wide array of complex commercial disputes, including distribution and manufacturers’ representation agreements, real estate, construction claims, trade secrets, computer fraud and abuse, UCC warranties and remedies, and labor and employment. He has been named an Illinois Super Lawyer since 2005 and nominated by a Fortune 1000 client to BTI’s Client Service All-Star Team, an honor extended to only 70 lawyers nationwide. He is a frequent speaker on the topics of force majeure, non-compete agreements, commission disputes and Uniform Commercial Code warranties and remedies, to various trade and bar associations and client groups.

Legally Speaking is a regular department in Agency Sales magazine. This column features articles from a variety of legal professionals and is intended to showcase their individual opinions only. The contents of this column should not be construed as personal legal advice; the opinions expressed herein are not the opinions of MANA, its management, or its directors.